tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-709902749259942121.post7567351774345956360..comments2019-08-01T14:12:37.386-07:00Comments on My Continuing Journey: The Church Doesn't Hide its HistoryHeath Workmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05876235572567271859noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-709902749259942121.post-82192313476639621762016-08-29T21:04:32.257-07:002016-08-29T21:04:32.257-07:00They are supposed to be in Yale's library. Thi...They are supposed to be in Yale's library. This appears to be the URL, but I think you have to have some sort of Yale account to access. http://drs.library.yale.edu/HLTransformer/HLTransServlet?stylename=yul.ead2002.xhtml.xsl&pid=beinecke:quinndm&clear-stylesheet-cache=yesHeath Workmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05876235572567271859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-709902749259942121.post-49795488258462464702016-08-16T16:58:07.513-07:002016-08-16T16:58:07.513-07:00The Co50 minute release process should be ridiculo...The Co50 minute release process should be ridiculously short and easy: 1: Scan to PDF<br />2: Upload to hosting site.<br /><br />Any variance from this process almost certainly indicates anything less than transparency Troy, Gena and Kidshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10275599304312991379noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-709902749259942121.post-83330853777727637032016-08-16T14:33:34.387-07:002016-08-16T14:33:34.387-07:00I agree. I don't really see the value added b...I agree. I don't really see the value added by redacting a historical source. On the one hand, it's great that the church is putting this source material out there. But if you can't trust it to be complete, what good does it do? So what if there are some unflattering bits tucked away in a journal? Let the world see the whole picture and own it. I hope they don't try this with the Council of Fifty minutes. But the fact that it has taken this long sure makes you wonder.<br /><br />Do you by chance have a source for the Michael Quinn transcription information? Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00276610560089503338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-709902749259942121.post-7737171821293123062016-08-13T17:54:36.367-07:002016-08-13T17:54:36.367-07:00I have just been studying D&C section 27, whic...I have just been studying D&C section 27, which contains perhaps the greatest change in the D&C. Joseph Smith said the whole section was given at the same time, but there are at least three places (Joseph Smith papers Manuscript Book 1, Times and Seasons, and Book of Commandments, that don't contain the change, which was only added to the D&C in 1835. Yeah, they change things.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13486000026674867248noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-709902749259942121.post-87818777872484898212016-08-13T17:54:18.856-07:002016-08-13T17:54:18.856-07:00I have just been studying D&C section 27, whic...I have just been studying D&C section 27, which contains perhaps the greatest change in the D&C. Joseph Smith said the whole section was given at the same time, but there are at least three places (Joseph Smith papers Manuscript Book 1, Times and Seasons, and Book of Commandments, that don't contain the change, which was only added to the D&C in 1835. Yeah, they change things.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13486000026674867248noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-709902749259942121.post-67128283675753068202016-08-12T16:21:16.301-07:002016-08-12T16:21:16.301-07:00For a much more recent example: there is also the ...For a much more recent example: there is also the 1984 Ronald E. Poelman General Conference talk. The talk was re-recorded with new words. The old one was still recorded and is available on Youtube. You will notice that the spray of flowers in the original recording matches the podium flowers in the talk before and the talk after, but the re-recording shows no flowers on the podium. The version of the talk published in the Ensign matched the new recording. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_E._PoelmanDavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00149261347501952631noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-709902749259942121.post-31488774047722477112016-08-12T16:20:55.123-07:002016-08-12T16:20:55.123-07:00For a much more recent example: there is also the ...For a much more recent example: there is also the 1984 Ronald E. Poelman General Conference talk. The talk was re-recorded with new words. The old one was still recorded and is available on Youtube. You will notice that the spray of flowers in the original recording matches the podium flowers in the talk before and the talk after, but the re-recording shows no flowers on the podium. The version of the talk published in the Ensign matched the new recording. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_E._PoelmanDavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00149261347501952631noreply@blogger.com